EXHIBIT 2
How experts evaluate celebrity endorsers
How experts evaluate celebrity endorsers
Relative importance of
|
||
celebrity selection
|
||
Overall celebrity
|
criteria within
|
|
selection categories
|
overall categories
|
Mean values *
|
Celebrity
|
Trustworthiness
|
2.19
|
credibility
|
Expertise
|
2.67
|
Uses
the product
|
2.76
|
|
(most
important
|
Composed
|
4.17
|
category)
|
Many
endorsements
|
4.40
|
Outgoing
and bold
|
4.71
|
|
Celebrity/audience
|
Audience
aspired to be like
|
|
match-up
|
the
celebrity
|
1.88
|
Values
|
2.40
|
|
(tied
for second
|
Audiences
see themselves as
|
|
most
important
|
being
like the celeb
|
2.70
|
category)
|
Appearance
|
3.95
|
Biographical
background
|
4.10
|
|
Celebrity/product
|
Image
|
1.53
|
match-up
|
Reputation
|
2.23
|
Values
|
2.60
|
|
(tied
for second
|
Appearance
|
3.77
|
most
important
|
||
category)
|
||
Celebrity
|
Easy to
recognize
|
1.60
|
attractiveness
|
Likable/friendly
|
2.55
|
Social
association
|
3.19
|
|
(next
most
|
Physical
attraction
|
3.59
|
important
category)
|
Occupational
association
|
4.00
|
Additional
|
Endorsement
fee
|
2.00
|
considerations
|
Publicity
risk
|
2.12
|
(next
most
|
Life cycle
stage of product
|
3.23
|
important
category)
|
Probability
of hiring celeb
|
3.71
|
Exclusive
representation
|
3.91
|
* The
lower the mean value, the more important is a celebrity-selection criterion
within a category. These means are averages of respondents' rank-ordering of
items within the overall celebrity selection categories and therefore can be
compared within but not across classifications.
No comments:
Post a Comment